It’s an interesting point you raise here. First of, you begin with one side (sane) being as rational as possible thus sending out a feeling of self-awareness as well as being “right”. Farther down, we see the other side gradually take the upper hand (insane) by using the same logic of its “accuser” if you will, against him.
Now, this is one of those things I had to ask and of course comment. Seems to me, you take no sides in this post, but if you had to, wouldn’t you say that each character is right in his own way of thinking by using the rationale each has been brought up to believe and use in life?

Leave a comment

No comments yet.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s